Timeline for Why recommend editing a question if the editing is ignored afterwards?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2018 at 17:59 | comment | added | Cascabel | I think the answers still apply, though: it's definitely not great that you got more close votes using the same close reason and no clarifications until mine. But of course, it's possible to make some good edits and still have a question be close-worthy, so while it's good to acknowledge that, I'm not sure exactly how we could reward it. It's hard to assess this in detail since the question is now deleted. | |
| May 13, 2018 at 17:02 | comment | added | Thorsten S. | I have replied in my question, again thanks for the apology. | |
| May 13, 2018 at 15:28 | history | edited | Cascabel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| May 13, 2018 at 15:23 | history | answered | Cascabel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |