Timeline for Is asking a question lacking specific details acceptable on this site?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2019 at 12:13 | history | edited | OldPadawan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removed a part that was not intended to be added (wrong place) - sorry
|
| Feb 1, 2019 at 11:32 | history | edited | OldPadawan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 666 characters in body
|
| Jan 30, 2019 at 22:16 | comment | added | OldPadawan | Glad it helped :) about derivations or duplicates, I'd say: "case by case", and depending on the goal and wording. Community would decide. My first thought at this moment. | |
| Jan 30, 2019 at 21:41 | comment | added | Anilla | Thanks for the answer! This definitely makes a lot of sense. Even with specifics, an answer can have a lot to work with and too many abstractions would make it even more difficult to narrow down a conclusion. The remaining concern is having derivations of an archetype question. Would we refer them as duplicates? Or allow them to be answered just as any other question? | |
| Jan 30, 2019 at 17:56 | history | edited | OldPadawan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 340 characters in body
|
| Jan 30, 2019 at 12:23 | history | edited | OldPadawan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 41 characters in body
|
| Jan 30, 2019 at 11:45 | history | edited | OldPadawan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 69 characters in body
|
| Jan 30, 2019 at 11:25 | history | answered | OldPadawan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |