Whenever someone calls someone else a "women", I automatically think of someone over the age of 20, I would find it odd to call a child a "women" (as they are more like a "girl"). With the usage of the women tag, should this tag be called women or should it be renamed to something age neutral such as female (or females).
Alternatively, if the women is good enough, should we also have a girl for younger people, or would we just use the women tag for all ages?
This tag actually makes me really uncomfortable.
I'd prefer it just didn't exist at all. The very fact that it's only currently used on three questions would make it easy to kill and, to add to that, if it was applied to every question that was actually about females, it'd essentially become a meta tag. I also find it somewhat amusing that there isn't a men tag.
I vote we just get rid of it entirely and let the gender of the person be clear in the question itself.
Something that oddly wasn't mentioned yet... We have gender that should work in all cases where gender is a significant factor...
On top of what Catija said, the tag is essentially a meta tag, as it can't be used on its own. That's why we should kill it with fire altogether, instead of changing it to some more age-neutral tag.
I think it's a meta tag and propose we burn it.
I don't think it serves a decent distinction purpose either, and the topic of "women" is so hilariously broad that it doesn't even categorize properly.
