Regarding the deletion of an answer for not answering the core question

Question

In the recent question How to communicate to my mother that I find it hurtful when she cooks dessert for everyone except me who is vegan? my answer got deleted.

I see the point of the answer not addressing the question of "how to communicate [...]" and adapted my answer by adding to it without changing the main points.

I could not start a vote on undeletion as it got moderator deleted.

Does addition to the answer suffice to be conform with the IPS answer requirements? I feel it addresses the main question fairly now, but maybe it is still lacking.

Answer 1

The reason why it was deleted is indeed only because it did not address the question, and since you edited your answer to provide exactly what was missing, I think your answer is now almost perfectly fine and should be undeleted.

I said almost perfectly fine because there is no explanation why OP should do what you suggest. Why do you think this is a good way to go about the situation?
OP of the question has also given this exact critique to your answer in chat:

To conclude, I would say that, without the why, I would probably won't do want they say because we are talking about my relationship with my mother and I don't want to makes things worse.

So if you want to improve your answer further, this could be a place to start.

Answer 2

I saw that you edited your answer taking into account what was said in chat and I really appreciate that.

To make it even more perfect, I have some other remarks.

I feel like it still doesn't really explain why I should "be direct and honest" (even though everything else that you added is very interesting).

Also, I don't feel like that the "who is rude" part really add value to the post. Maybe you should consider getting rid of it? (other people might disagree).