Timeline for To what extent do we respect the OP's request?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2017 at 7:25 | comment | added | User 27 | Perhaps, when, as an answerer, it is believed that there is poor understanding of the problem, the surest course would be to use comments for clarification. In the same fashion as suggested for "factual" errors on the parenting site. After all, that is what is being considered, that the facts, as perceived by the OP, are incomplete, or poorly understood. | |
| Aug 23, 2017 at 7:22 | comment | added | User 27 | Challenging the premise when it's likely a faulty perception of the situation should be explicitly covered in the answer, saying what part is believed to be incorrect, what the correct perception is, and why. Then an answer can be given that fits the "new" perception. If the OP has excluded different interpretations of the situation, however, then following this plan, no matter how eloquent, would still be NAA. | |
| Aug 23, 2017 at 3:53 | history | answered | apaul | CC BY-SA 3.0 |